JobAIRisk

Gambling Dealers

Gambling Dealers — AI exposure, safer roles, and a pivot plan.

Also known as: Card Dealer · Card Grader · Crap Shooter · Casino Dealer · Casino Worker · Big Six Dealer

AI Task Exposure Score

Moderate exposure

More exposed than 41% of 968 occupations · Rank #532 (1 = most exposed)

This score estimates how exposed the tasks in a role are to current and near-term AI capabilities. It does not predict whether a specific person will lose a job.

Most exposed tasks

Highest structured exposure values in this role’s task mix — the work AI systems can already do most of.

  • Compute amounts of players' wins or losses, or scan winning tickets presented by patrons to calculate the amount of money won.69
  • Refer patrons to gaming cashiers to collect winnings.64
  • Receive, verify, and record patrons' cash wagers.63

Augmentable tasks

Work where AI assists rather than replaces — the productivity frontier of this role.

  • Greet customers and make them feel welcome.49
  • Pay winnings or collect losing bets as established by the rules and procedures of a specific game.46
  • Exchange paper currency for playing chips or coin money.46

Most durable tasks

Lowest exposure — typically judgment, relationships, physical presence, or accountability. This is the human moat.

  • Prepare collection reports for submission to supervisors.26
  • Seat patrons at gaming tables.30
  • Supervise staff and monitor gambling tables to ensure security of the game.32

Task exposure values and classifications come from the versioned data release — they are structured data, not model output. Bars show exposure contribution relative to this role’s task mix.

What this means

A score of 45 puts Gambling Dealers in the second quartile of analyzed occupations. In practice, exposure this level is about the mix: 3 of 20 analyzed tasks lean automatable, 14 augmentable, and 3 durable. The useful question isn’t “will AI take this job” — it’s which tasks go first, which get faster, and where to reposition time. That’s what the personalized report maps against your actual week.

One next move: adopt AI deliberately on the augmentable tasks and build visible evidence of the durable ones.

Lower-exposure adjacent roles

No adjacent role in the current data release is at least 10 points lower with ≥50% skill overlap — we don’t label anything “safer” unless the data supports it.

Labor-market context

  • $34,320median wage
  • 83,910employed
  • 14,100annual openings
  • -0.7%projected growth

Context only — labor statistics are not inputs to the exposure score. See methodology.

Your week probably doesn’t match the average

This page scores the occupation. The $9 Personalized Risk & Action Report scores your task mix — paste what you actually do and get your own score, confidence level, task matrix, human moat, and a 7/30/90-day plan.

Personalize my result — $9

Related roles

Adjacent by skills or family — no exposure claim implied.

FAQ — Gambling Dealers

What does a score of 45 mean for a Gambling Dealers?
It means that, weighted across the 20 tasks we analyzed for this role, the task mix sits at 45 on a 0–100 exposure scale — in the second quartile of analyzed occupations. It measures task exposure to current and near-term AI capabilities, not the probability of losing a job.
Which tasks in this role are most exposed to AI?
The highest-exposure tasks are: Compute amounts of players' wins or losses, or scan winning tickets presented by patrons to calculate the amount of money won; Refer patrons to gaming cashiers to collect winnings; Receive, verify, and record patrons' cash wagers. Exposure is scored per task from structured data, not generated by a language model.
Which parts of this job are most durable?
The most durable responsibilities are: Prepare collection reports for submission to supervisors; Seat patrons at gaming tables; Supervise staff and monitor gambling tables to ensure security of the game. Durable tasks typically depend on judgment, relationships, physical presence, or accountability.
Is this score personalized to me?
No — this page shows the occupation-level baseline. Two people with the same title often do different work. The $9 personalized report recalculates the score from the tasks you actually do and builds a concrete 7/30/90-day plan around them.

Score version jr-v1 · data release 2026.07.11-r1 · updated 2026-07-11 · baseline mapping: 20 of 20 tasks carry source-level provenance · methodology